Williams writes: "Equality before the general rules of law is the only kind of equality conducive to liberty that can be secured without destroying liberty."
With many professions dominated by one race or gender or some other
category, should there be mandates like in healthcare for procedural
normalcy?
Do we want and need inequality in our society?
Is it best described by the word "inequality" or is that word used
to associate areas for change or injustice?
If there is inequality in professions should that be
corrected by Government?
Links:
SOTU Address: fairness
used extensively
Walter Williams writes on inequality of
several forms:
Rick Santorum's speech at the Detroit Economic Club stirred a bit of
controversy when he said: "I'm not about equality of result when it
comes to income inequality. There is income inequality in America. There
always has been, and hopefully -- and I do say that -- there always will
be." That kind of statement, though having merit, should not be made to
people who have little or no understanding. Let's look at inequality.
Kay S. Hymowitz's article "Why the Gender Gap Won't Go Away. Ever,"
in City Journal (Summer 2011), shows that female doctors earn only 64
percent of the income that male doctors earn. What should be done about
that? It turns out that only 16 percent of surgeons are women but 50
percent of pediatricians are women. Even though surgeons have many more
years of education and training than do pediatricians, should Congress
equalize their salaries or make pediatricians become surgeons?
Wage inequality is everywhere. According to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Asian men and women earn more than white men and women.
Female cafeteria attendants earn more than their male counterparts.
Females who are younger than 30 and have never been married earn
salaries 8 percent higher than males of the same description. Among
women who graduated from college during 1992-93, by 2003 more than
one-fifth were no longer in the workforce, and another 17 percent were
working part time. That's to be compared with only 2 percent of men in
either category. Hymowitz cites several studies showing significant
career choice and lifestyle differences between men and women that
result in income inequality.
There are other inequalities that ought to be addressed. With all
of the excitement about New York Knick Jeremy Lin's rising stardom,
nobody questions league domination by blacks, who are a mere 13 percent
of our population but constitute 80 percent of NBA players and are the
highest-paid ones. It's not much better in the NFL, with blacks being
65 percent of its players. Colleges have made diversity their primary
calling, but watch any basketball game and you'd be hard-put to find
white players in roles other than bench warming. Worse than that,
Japanese, Chinese and American Indian players aren't even recruited for
bench warming.
There's inequality in most jobs. According to 2010 BLS data, the
following jobs contain 1 percent female workers or less: boiler making,
brick masonry, stonemasonry, septic tank servicing, sewer pipe cleaning
and working with reinforcing iron and rebar. Maybe the reason female
workers aren't in these occupations is that too many are in other
occupations. Females are 97 percent of preschool and kindergarten
teachers, 80 percent of social workers, 82 percent of librarians and 92
percent of dietitians and nutritionists and registered nurses.
Anyone with one ounce of brains can see the problem and solution.
Congress has permitted -- and even fostered -- a misallocation of
people by race, sex and ethnicity. Courts have consistently concluded
that "gross" disparities are probative of a pattern and practice of
discrimination. So what to do? One remedy that Congress might consider
is to require females, who are overrepresented in fields such as
preschool and kindergarten teaching, to become boilermakers and brick
masons and mandate that male boilermakers and brick masons become
preschool and kindergarten teachers until both of their percentages are
equal to their percentages in the population.
You say, "Williams, that
would be totalitarianism!" But if Americans accept that Congress can
make us buy health insurance whether we want to or not, how much more
totalitarian would it be for Congress to allocate jobs in the name of
social equality and the good of our nation?
Nobel laureate Milton Friedman said: "A society that puts equality
before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before
equality will get a high degree of both." Equality before the general
rules of law is the only kind of equality conducive to liberty that can
be secured without destroying liberty.
Milton Friedman said: "A society that puts equality before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before equality will get a high degree of both."